|
1 |
|
Charles Mynors
FRTPI
ARICS
Barrister
examines the new provisions
relating to Article
4
directions
M’LEARNED FRIEND
Itis a commonplace observation that the
effect on the appearance of conservation
areas of relatively minor alterations to
buildings
—
particularly dwelling houses
—
can be cumulatively very unfortunate.
Until now, however, the powers avail-
able to planning authorities to control
such works have been severely limited
by the fact that many such operations are
normally permitted automatically by the
General Development Order.
It has always been possible—at least in
theory
—
for control to be regained,
through the mechanism of an Article 4
direction, so that a specific application
has to be made for the carrying out of the
particular category of works concerned.
In practice, however, such directions
have in the past had to be approved by
the Secretary of State; and experience
has indicated that such approval was far
from easy to obtain. This has long been a
cause for concern by Conservation
Officers and others
—
including, most
recently and vociferously, the English
Historic Towns Forum in its report
Tou’nscape in Trouble.
The Government has now recognised
that concern, and Parliament has
approvedaprovisionwherebyauthorities
may in certain circumstances approve
their own directions, thus by-passing the
Secretary of State. The new arrangements
are introduced in the Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Develop-
ment) Order
1995,
which is one of the
two new Orders which replace the old
General Development Order 1988 with
effect from 3June 1995. As a result, there
are now essentially three types of
direction:
-
directions under art 4(2) affecting
conservation areas;
C]
directions underart 4(1)affecting only
listed buildings; and
-
directions under art 4(1) affecting
other land.
A direction under either art 4(1) or art
4(2) of the 1995 Order may be made by
the district or county planning authority
in relation to a conservation area, but
only by the district/borough council in
other cases (art 4(6)). In areas where
there are two tiers of local authority, a
direction made bya district council must
be notified to the county council, and
vice versa (arts 5(2), 6(6)). The Secretary
of State may also make a direction (art
4(1)).
ARTICLE 4(2) DIRECTIONS
An Article 4(2) direction may be made
where it is to restrict the carrying out, in
relation to a building or land that fronts ‘a
relevant location’ (that is, a highway,
waterway or open space), of develop-
ment in one or more of the following
categories:
LI
the enlargement, improvement or
other alteration of a dwelling house; any
alteration to its roof; the construction of
aporch; the provisionwithin its curtilage
ofa building, enclosure, swimming pool
etc; the provision of a hard surface: or the
installation etc of a sateffite antenna (nor-
mally permitted under Classes A, C to F,
or H of Part 1 of Sched 2 to the 1995
Order);
L]
the erection, construction, mainte-
nance, improvement or alteration of a
gate, fence, wall or other means of enclo-
sure within the curtilage of a dwelling
house (Part 2, Class A);
LI
the painting of the exterior of any part
of a dwelling house or of a building or
enclosure within the curtilage of a dwell-
ing house (Part 2, Class C); and
LI
the demolition of all or part of a gate,
fence, wall or other means of enclosure
within the curtilage of a dwelling house
(Part 31, Class B—introduced for the first
time in 1995).
A direction under art 4(2) may also be
made to restrict the erection, alteration
or removal of a chimney on a dwelling
house or on a building in the curtilage of
a dwelling house, whetherornot it fronts
a relevant location.
ARTICLE 4(2) DIRECTIONS:
PROCEDURE
A direction, whether under art 4(2) or
under art 4(1), must be drawn up accu-
rately. Theplanningauthontymustthere-
fore first consider carefully which prop-
erties are to be covered, and which
Classes, or which parts of which Classes,
of permitted development are to be re-
stricted. These should generally both be
kept to the minimum possible: if a direc-
tion covers too much, it is more difficult
to draft accurately, more time-consum-
ing to prepare, less likelyto be effectively
enforced, and therefore more likely to be
ignored by owners. The best approach is
probably to introduce smaller directions
more often, rather than to attempt to
cover everything in one large direction.
The properties involved must be
specified with precision, particularly in
the case of a direction covering a large
area. This may best be done both on a
map and on a list. The choice of categories
of development to be controlled needs
to be considered carefully, and defined
precisely but dearly. This is particularly
important where a direction relates to
development within Class A of Part 1,
since this covers awide varietyof different
types of work. The direction will be a
formaldocumentbut, ifitis tobe effective,
must also be capable ofbeing understood
by property owners and occupiers.
Once it has made a direction, the
authority must then publicise it by
inserting a notice in a local newspaper
(art 6(1)(a)). This must:
-
set out the properties and classes of
development involved;
LI
explain the effect of the direction, and
that it is made under art 4(2);
LI
name a place where the direction
(together with a map showing the area
affected) may be inspected; and
LI
specify a period (of at least 21 days)
within which representations may be
made to the local planning authority in
relation to the direction.
32
CONTEXT 46
|
|
1 |